nep33ts:

insurrectionary-frybreadism:

lenins-and-things:

carnival-phantasm:

the-defiant-pupil:

mojave-red:

rantingmacaron:

mojave-red:

more-snatched-photos:

It doesn’t make us go crazy. We just don’t understand the why. No one has ever satisfactorily explained why bagged milk is better than milk in jugs.

There is no literal reason since the jugs we use are just as cheap as bags and with a bag you need to put it into something as soon as it’s opened because otherwise you’re crying over spilt milk

I don’t understand why y’all use jugs though. They’re so impractical.

No they’re not. You have a self contained stand able container. 

With a bag you have one floppy boi

We have holders for that. There’s no real difference.

Wouldn’t it be crazy if there was a way you could hold milk without grabbing a separate holder? Some sort of solid plastic or cardboard container, that would be so cool.

Then there are Soviet milk pyramids. Those are the oddest milk containers of all but they’re really cool.

Thanks! That’s horrible! Curse you for sharing!

I LOVE THIS PYRAMID

ultra-frog:

probablyafish:

eelpatrickharris:

fish that no hobbyist should own, period:

  • arapaimas
  • alligator gar (and most gars in general)
  • redtail catfish
  • peacock bass
  • lungfish
  • african tigerfish
  • payara/vampire tetras
  • sturgeon
  • arowanas
  • electric eels
  • stingrays

unless you live in an area where one of those fish is native and you can build a suitable pond; or you own a tank that exceeds 10,000 gallons and have the abilities and funds to maintain it; you have no business owning anything on that list.

it’s not elitist. it’s not some PETA-approved tree hugger nonsense. it’s just common sense. fish like arowanas, peacock bass, sturgeon, and redtail cats? big, strong, active fish that need more than a swimming pool to be comfortable. payaras, gars, lungfish, electric eels, and african tigerfish are large and dangerous. stingrays are delicate fish that require an insane amount of space.

yes, there are some serious fishkeepers who can house fish that size, but they’re few and far between. a proper redtail catfish enclosure would cost you more than a high-end Mercedes just to set up. if you’re willing to dedicate that much time and money to a fish, then you’re not a plain hobbyist.

(also, the Monster Fish Keepers forum should be burned to the ground. thanks for coming to my ted talk.)

image

For more clarification, fish like the Alligator Gar that can grow to be twice as large as a 6 foot human in their natural habitat, and live for 25-50 years, (the red tailed catfish is to the right of the human)

image

and naturally live in places like this

image

should NOT be housed in pathetic tanks/pools like this

image

This is literally just cruel. There is no reason to keep a monster fish indoors or even in captivity at all. What benefit do you even get out of cramping a giant fish into a small container?

The fucking pet trade is a huge factor as too why half of these monster fish are critically endangered. 

There’s a store that has a fully grown red tail in a 55 gallon where they can’t turn around and it makes me feel so shitty

draconym:

draconym:

I had planned to do something totally different with my day but instead I made a whole bunch of pride birds! I plan to put them on Redbubble asap.

Lesbian: pink-headed warbler
Gay: eastern rosella
Bi: varied bunting
Trans: lilac-breasted roller
Genderqueer: woodstar
Aro/ace: pink-headed fruit dove

image

ADDITIONAL BIRBS

Pansexual: oriental dwarf kingfisher
Nonbinary: gouldian finch
Asexual: purple-crowned fairywren

sockablock:

Uh, yeah, I am currently at 34. My max is 49.

  • Holy shit.

What?

  • That’s just real low.

Is it? Is it, Griffin, is it REAL low? Is it almost like some fucking LICHES of our imagination SUCKED my hit points away from me, a WIZARD? Is that what may account for the LOWNESS? It’s like, so CRAZY low, HUH?